Isaac Becroft vs Corban Crowther Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 02 Sep at 02:24 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
I. Becroft vs C. Crowther

NZL
1
Win
Played
1
Win

NZL
1
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Becroft 1 - 1 Crowther
They have played 5 sets in total, with Isaac Becroft winning 3 and Corban Crowther winning 2. The last match between Isaac Becroft and Corban Crowther was at the M25 Nakhon Pathom, 02-09-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Isaac Becroft getting the victory 6-1 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Becroft | 1 |
| Crowther | 1 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(R1) M25 Nakhon Pathom(09-02-25)
(R2) M15 Wellington(12-13-23)
I. Becroft vs C. Crowther H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 59.20% (74-51) | Career Total W/L | 51.42% (109-103) |
| 1 | Hard | 1 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0.00% (0-1) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
I. Becroft vs C. Crowther Match Preview:
- Crowther holds an edge in second serve performance, winning 52.88% of points over the past six months compared to Becroft's 47.27%.
- How effective are both players in returning serves? Crowther leads with 46.23% of second serve return points won, while Becroft is slightly behind at 45.06%. For first serve returns, Crowther's advantage widens with 28.98% compared to Becroft's 25.55%.
- Under pressure, Crowther excels by saving 58.73% of breakpoints, which surpasses Becroft's 52.38%.
- Performance overview over the last year shows Crowther winning 41.03% of matches, while Becroft boasts a better rate at 59.26%.
- Crowther's prime surface is Hard with a 54% success rate, whereas Becroft excels on Indoor Hard with a 60% winning percentage.
- Becroft has competed against higher-ranked opponents, facing an average rank of 313.93 compared to Crowther's 386.18.
- Crowther has a direct H2H record advantage, having beaten Becroft in their only meeting, which was a three-set match on Hard.
- If the game extends to a deciding set, Becroft seems more reliable, having won 89% of such matches compared to Crowther's 22% over the last year.
- In recent form, on breakpoint opportunities, Becroft has a slight edge, converting 39.47% of chances, whereas Crowther converts 37.84%.
Editorial Prediction (September 2, 2025, UTC):
In light of the presented statistics, Crowther demonstrates stronger second serve and return games, which are significant predictors of match success. His record-saving breakpoints also highlights his resilience under pressure.
Becroft offers a more consistent year-round performance with a higher match win percentage and greater success against tougher opponents. His proficiency in converting break opportunities might prove crucial.
Their only head-to-head meeting went to a deciding set, with Crowther coming out on top. However, Becroft's superior performance in deciding sets could play an influential role this time.
Considering these factors, while both players have merits, Becroft's consistency and ability in high-pressure scenarios suggest he is the more likely winner for the upcoming match.
Isaac Becroft vs Corban Crowther Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
I. Becroft vs C. Crowther H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 28 | Games Won | 20 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 12 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 2:15:56 | Average Match Time | 2:15:56 |
| 66% (98/149) | 1st Serve % | 61% (95/157) |
| 65% (64/98) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (52/95) |
| 47% (24/51) | 2nd Serve Win % | 35% (22/62) |
| 46% (12/26) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (8/16) |
| 53% (83/157) | Return Points Win % | 41% (61/149) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 50% (1/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (1/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 50% (1/2) |
Recent Performance Stats
I. Becroft Recent Matches Played
C. Crowther Recent Matches Played

I. Becroft vs C. Crowther Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59.20% (74/51) | YTD Win/Loss | 51.42% (109/103) |
| 55.63% (158/126) | Sets Win/Loss | 52.48% (243/220) |
| 53.21% (1385/1218) | Games Win/Loss | 51.58% (2284/2144) |
| 59.13% (68/47) | Hard Win/Loss | 53.68% (102/88) |
| 0% (0/0) | Clay Win/Loss | 31.82% (7/15) |
| 60.00% (6/4) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.18 | Aces Per Game | 0.21 |
| 227 | Aces Total | 455 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.14 |
| 215 | Total Double Faults | 298 |
| 1:21:48 | Average Match Time | 1:7:48 |
| 430.57 | Average Opponent Rank | 301.28 |
| 66% (4208/6340) | 1st Serve % | 63% (5666/8926) |
| 64% (2701/4208) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (3746/5666) |
| 50% (1056/2132) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (1623/3259) |
| 46% (305/665) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (361/844) |
| 42% (2640/6311) | Return Points Win % | 39% (3486/8854) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/5) |
| 61.16% (74/47) | Futures W/L | 52.66% (109/98) |
| 60% (72/121) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 52% (109/210) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (12/24) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (28/52) |
| 69% (25/36) | Deciding Set Win % | 40% (17/42) |
| 92% (63/58) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (116/101) |
| 8% (63/5) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (116/15) |
| 24% (62/15) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 9% (96/9) |